↓ Skip to main content

Fecal contamination, parasite risk, and waterhole use by wild animals in a dry deciduous forest

Overview of attention for article published in Behavioral Ecology & Sociobiology, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
Title
Fecal contamination, parasite risk, and waterhole use by wild animals in a dry deciduous forest
Published in
Behavioral Ecology & Sociobiology, November 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00265-019-2769-6
Authors

Caroline R. Amoroso, Peter M. Kappeler, Claudia Fichtel, Charles L. Nunn

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 December 2019.
All research outputs
#7,484,485
of 14,185,873 outputs
Outputs from Behavioral Ecology & Sociobiology
#1,538
of 2,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,851
of 308,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavioral Ecology & Sociobiology
#21
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,185,873 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,259 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,628 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.