↓ Skip to main content

Immuno-enhancement effects of Platycodon grandiflorum extracts in splenocytes and a cyclophosphamide-induced immunosuppressed rat model

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
Title
Immuno-enhancement effects of Platycodon grandiflorum extracts in splenocytes and a cyclophosphamide-induced immunosuppressed rat model
Published in
BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, November 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12906-019-2724-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eun-Mi Noh, Jeong-Mi Kim, Hak Yong Lee, Hyun-Kyung Song, Sang Ok Joung, Hye Jeong Yang, Min Jung Kim, Kang Sung Kim, Young-Rae Lee

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2019.
All research outputs
#10,684,617
of 14,058,867 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine
#1,763
of 2,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,854
of 261,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine
#123
of 324 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,058,867 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,933 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,781 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 324 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.