↓ Skip to main content

Deep Intact Proteoform Characterization in Human Cell Lysate Using High-pH and Low-pH Reversed-Phase Liquid Chromatography

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters
Title
Deep Intact Proteoform Characterization in Human Cell Lysate Using High-pH and Low-pH Reversed-Phase Liquid Chromatography
Published in
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, November 2019
DOI 10.1007/s13361-019-02315-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dahang Yu, Zhe Wang, Kellye A. Cupp-Sutton, Xiaowen Liu, Si Wu

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2019.
All research outputs
#2,610,223
of 14,110,335 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
#179
of 2,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,512
of 289,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
#5
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,110,335 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,394 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,395 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.