↓ Skip to main content

Repellent activities of essential oils rich in sesquiterpenoids from Saussurea amara (L.) DC. and Sigesbeckia pubescens Makino against two stored-product insects

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Science & Pollution Research, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
Title
Repellent activities of essential oils rich in sesquiterpenoids from Saussurea amara (L.) DC. and Sigesbeckia pubescens Makino against two stored-product insects
Published in
Environmental Science & Pollution Research, November 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11356-019-06876-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhi-Hua Li, Yang Wang, Jian-Sheng Sun, Ji-Gang Li, Ke-Xing Zou, Hong Liu, Gui-Xiang Li, Zhi-Zhong Hu, Li-Zheng Nong, Zhen-Xing Ning, Yan Wu, Shu-Shan Du

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2019.
All research outputs
#11,145,390
of 14,051,039 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science & Pollution Research
#2,018
of 4,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,348
of 259,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science & Pollution Research
#32
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,051,039 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,176 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,111 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.