↓ Skip to main content

X-linked lymphoproliferative syndrome in mainland China: review of clinical, genetic, and immunological characteristic

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Pediatrics, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
Title
X-linked lymphoproliferative syndrome in mainland China: review of clinical, genetic, and immunological characteristic
Published in
European Journal of Pediatrics, November 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00431-019-03512-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tao Xu, Qin Zhao, Wenyan Li, Xuemei Chen, Xiuhong Xue, Zhi Chen, Xiao Du, Xiaoming Bai, Qian Zhao, Lina Zhou, Xuemei Tang, Xi Yang, Hirokazu Kanegane, Xiaodong Zhao

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2020.
All research outputs
#8,146,708
of 14,162,573 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Pediatrics
#1,553
of 2,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,794
of 304,440 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Pediatrics
#54
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,162,573 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,474 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,440 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.