↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of D2-plus radical resection for gastric cancer with pyloric invasion

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Surgery, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Evaluation of D2-plus radical resection for gastric cancer with pyloric invasion
Published in
BMC Surgery, November 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12893-019-0605-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhi-yuan Xu, Can Hu, Shangqi Chen, Yi-an Du, Ling Huang, Peng-fei Yu, Li-jing Wang, Xiang-dong Cheng

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2020.
All research outputs
#11,925,201
of 15,628,381 outputs
Outputs from BMC Surgery
#271
of 730 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#244,922
of 363,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Surgery
#37
of 145 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,628,381 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 730 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,594 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 145 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.