↓ Skip to main content

Correction to: Identifying significantly impacted pathways: a comprehensive review and assessment

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology (Online Edition), November 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Correction to: Identifying significantly impacted pathways: a comprehensive review and assessment
Published in
Genome Biology (Online Edition), November 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13059-019-1882-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nguyen, Tuan-Minh, Shafi, Adib, Nguyen, Tin, Draghici, Sorin

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 33%
Researcher 1 33%
Unspecified 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 33%
Chemistry 1 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2019.
All research outputs
#11,145,438
of 14,051,039 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology (Online Edition)
#2,982
of 3,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,348
of 259,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology (Online Edition)
#278
of 282 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,051,039 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,126 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,107 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 282 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.