↓ Skip to main content

Complementary information from fatty acid and nutrient stoichiometry data improve stream food web analyses

Overview of attention for article published in Hydrobiologia, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
Title
Complementary information from fatty acid and nutrient stoichiometry data improve stream food web analyses
Published in
Hydrobiologia, November 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10750-019-04126-8
Authors

Monica Torres-Ruiz, John D. Wehr

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2019.
All research outputs
#11,145,345
of 14,051,039 outputs
Outputs from Hydrobiologia
#2,094
of 3,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,536
of 259,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hydrobiologia
#52
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,051,039 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,213 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,420 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.