↓ Skip to main content

Visuospatial Neglect - a Theory-Informed Overview of Current and Emerging Strategies and a Systematic Review on the Therapeutic Use of Non-invasive Brain Stimulation

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychology Review, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Visuospatial Neglect - a Theory-Informed Overview of Current and Emerging Strategies and a Systematic Review on the Therapeutic Use of Non-invasive Brain Stimulation
Published in
Neuropsychology Review, November 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11065-019-09417-4
Authors

Paul Theo Zebhauser, Marine Vernet, Evelyn Unterburger, Anna-Katharine Brem

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 50%
Student > Master 1 25%
Researcher 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 2 50%
Sports and Recreations 1 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2019.
All research outputs
#11,151,693
of 14,056,067 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychology Review
#276
of 302 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,933
of 257,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychology Review
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,056,067 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 302 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,273 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.