↓ Skip to main content

Accuracy in detecting inadequate research reporting by early career peer reviewers using an online CONSORT-based peer-review tool (COBPeer) versus the usual peer-review process: a cross-sectional…

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
50 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
Accuracy in detecting inadequate research reporting by early career peer reviewers using an online CONSORT-based peer-review tool (COBPeer) versus the usual peer-review process: a cross-sectional diagnostic study
Published in
BMC Medicine, November 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12916-019-1436-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anthony Chauvin, Philippe Ravaud, David Moher, David Schriger, Sally Hopewell, Daniel Shanahan, Sabina Alam, Gabriel Baron, Jean-Philippe Regnaux, Perrine Crequit, Valeria Martinez, Carolina Riveros, Laurence Le Cleach, Alessandro Recchioni, Douglas G. Altman, Isabelle Boutron

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 19%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Professor 3 8%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 6 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 14%
Social Sciences 4 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Other 9 24%
Unknown 7 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,116,957
of 25,551,063 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#788
of 4,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,620
of 475,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#16
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,551,063 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,047 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 475,930 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.