↓ Skip to main content

Seeing red: towards an improved protocol for the identification of madder- and cochineal-based pigments by fiber optics reflectance spectroscopy (FORS)

Overview of attention for article published in Heritage Science, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
Title
Seeing red: towards an improved protocol for the identification of madder- and cochineal-based pigments by fiber optics reflectance spectroscopy (FORS)
Published in
Heritage Science, November 2019
DOI 10.1186/s40494-019-0335-1
Authors

Beatriz Fonseca, Catherine Schmidt Patterson, Monica Ganio, Douglas MacLennan, Karen Trentelman

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 5%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 22 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 13 22%
Arts and Humanities 12 20%
Materials Science 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Chemical Engineering 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 23 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2019.
All research outputs
#7,064,170
of 23,175,240 outputs
Outputs from Heritage Science
#204
of 426 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,290
of 365,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Heritage Science
#6
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,175,240 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 426 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,947 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.