@thomasgpadilla @shannonmattern Still thinking with Stoler’s piece on colonial archives: Stoler, Ann Laura. “Colonial Archives and the Arts of Governance.” Archival Science 2, no. 1 (March 1, 2002): 87–109. https://t.co/hcQmXYLZn8.
RT @amaliasl: "The imperial archive was both the supreme technology of the late nineteenth century imperial state and the telling prototype…
RT @amaliasl: "The imperial archive was both the supreme technology of the late nineteenth century imperial state and the telling prototype…
RT @amaliasl: "The imperial archive was both the supreme technology of the late nineteenth century imperial state and the telling prototype…
RT @amaliasl: "The imperial archive was both the supreme technology of the late nineteenth century imperial state and the telling prototype…
"The imperial archive was both the supreme technology of the late nineteenth century imperial state and the telling prototype of a postmodern one, predicated on global domination of information and the circuits through which “facts” move." Ann Stoler. htt
RT @jun_naibzade: 人文学の分野での火付け役となったのは、おそらく、 Ann Laura Stoler, "Colonial archives and the arts of governance." Archival Science 2, 87–109 (20…
RT @jun_naibzade: 人文学の分野での火付け役となったのは、おそらく、 Ann Laura Stoler, "Colonial archives and the arts of governance." Archival Science 2, 87–109 (20…
RT @jun_naibzade: 人文学の分野での火付け役となったのは、おそらく、 Ann Laura Stoler, "Colonial archives and the arts of governance." Archival Science 2, 87–109 (20…
人文学の分野での火付け役となったのは、おそらく、 Ann Laura Stoler, "Colonial archives and the arts of governance." Archival Science 2, 87–109 (2002). のようだ。まだ読んでないが。 https://t.co/Cmq2JNnA1N
Excelente artículo de Ann Stoler, Colonial archives and the arts of governance, http://t.co/uzfTBjH9