↓ Skip to main content

Endocrine toxicity of immune checkpoint inhibitors: a real-world study leveraging US Food and Drug Administration adverse events reporting system

Overview of attention for article published in Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Endocrine toxicity of immune checkpoint inhibitors: a real-world study leveraging US Food and Drug Administration adverse events reporting system
Published in
Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer, November 2019
DOI 10.1186/s40425-019-0754-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yinghong Zhai, Xiaofei Ye, Fangyuan Hu, Jinfang Xu, Xiaojing Guo, Yonglong Zhuang, Jia He

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 60%
Librarian 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 80%
Unknown 1 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2019.
All research outputs
#7,851,296
of 13,961,506 outputs
Outputs from Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer
#689
of 893 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,225
of 201,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer
#235
of 312 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,961,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 893 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.7. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,779 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 312 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.