↓ Skip to main content

Explaining mental health recovery in the context of structural disadvantage: the unrealised potential of critical realism

Overview of attention for article published in Social Theory & Health, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Explaining mental health recovery in the context of structural disadvantage: the unrealised potential of critical realism
Published in
Social Theory & Health, November 2019
DOI 10.1057/s41285-019-00122-z
Authors

Dimitar Karadzhov

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 29%
Student > Master 5 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Lecturer 1 3%
Professor 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 9 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 8 26%
Psychology 4 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 10 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2022.
All research outputs
#6,484,618
of 23,575,346 outputs
Outputs from Social Theory & Health
#189
of 289 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,211
of 361,535 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Theory & Health
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,575,346 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 289 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,535 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.