↓ Skip to main content

Sweated Labor as a Social Phenomenon Lessons from the 19th Century Sweatshop Discussion

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Business Ethics, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Sweated Labor as a Social Phenomenon Lessons from the 19th Century Sweatshop Discussion
Published in
Journal of Business Ethics, November 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10551-019-04293-7
Authors

Michael S. Aßländer

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2019.
All research outputs
#11,498,213
of 15,045,842 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business Ethics
#1,836
of 2,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#181,955
of 270,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business Ethics
#48
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,045,842 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,318 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,276 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.