↓ Skip to main content

Immunostimulants in respiratory diseases: focus on Pidotimod

Overview of attention for article published in Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Immunostimulants in respiratory diseases: focus on Pidotimod
Published in
Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine, November 2019
DOI 10.1186/s40248-019-0195-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francesca Puggioni, Magna Alves-Correia, Manar-Farouk Mohamed, Niccolò Stomeo, Riccardo Mager, Massimiliano Marinoni, Francesca Racca, Giovanni Paoletti, Gilda Varricchi, Veronica Giorgis, Giovanni Melioli, Giorgio Walter Canonica, Enrico Heffler

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 50%
Professor 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 50%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2019.
All research outputs
#10,577,973
of 13,906,814 outputs
Outputs from Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine
#153
of 232 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,122
of 176,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine
#10
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,906,814 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 232 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,818 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.