RT @AnnelieseArno: "Often studies have been conducted under highly controlled conditions using artificial bibliographic datasets." yasyasya…
RT @noelTbrewer: AI is great for systematic reviews when you want ... [checks notes] low quality. https://t.co/Sfko7FopAt
RT @AnnelieseArno: "Often studies have been conducted under highly controlled conditions using artificial bibliographic datasets." yasyasya…
RT @CEBaP_evidence: Can #ArtificialIntelligence assist us in developing #SystematicReviews? https://t.co/7Zc5TBVPgP The current approaches…
RT @adamgdunn: Ouch. "The accuracy of DistillerAI is not yet adequate to replace a human screener temporarily during abstract screening for…
RT @adamgdunn: Ouch. "The accuracy of DistillerAI is not yet adequate to replace a human screener temporarily during abstract screening for…
RT @noelTbrewer: AI is great for systematic reviews when you want ... [checks notes] low quality. https://t.co/Sfko7FopAt
Can #ArtificialIntelligence assist us in developing #SystematicReviews? https://t.co/7Zc5TBVPgP The current approaches still miss too many relevant studies but we are closely following the recent advances in #Automated tools for screening #evidence on the
RT @AnnelieseArno: "Often studies have been conducted under highly controlled conditions using artificial bibliographic datasets." yasyasya…
RT @AnnelieseArno: "Often studies have been conducted under highly controlled conditions using artificial bibliographic datasets." yasyasya…
RT @AnnelieseArno: "Often studies have been conducted under highly controlled conditions using artificial bibliographic datasets." yasyasya…
RT @noelTbrewer: AI is great for systematic reviews when you want ... [checks notes] low quality. https://t.co/Sfko7FopAt
A philosopher of medicine needs to write a piece (or maybe there is one?) about the cognitive and emotional judgments involved in systematic reviews. AI wouldn't be better/worse but just replicate these investments.
RT @noelTbrewer: AI is great for systematic reviews when you want ... [checks notes] low quality. https://t.co/Sfko7FopAt
RT @noelTbrewer: AI is great for systematic reviews when you want ... [checks notes] low quality. https://t.co/Sfko7FopAt
AI is great for systematic reviews when you want ... [checks notes] low quality.
Ouch. "The accuracy of DistillerAI is not yet adequate to replace a human screener temporarily during abstract screening for systematic reviews." https://t.co/Xm9SudBw8B
RT @AnnelieseArno: "Often studies have been conducted under highly controlled conditions using artificial bibliographic datasets." yasyasya…
"Often studies have been conducted under highly controlled conditions using artificial bibliographic datasets." yasyasyas https://t.co/EVXh4muBhO #systematicreviews #evidencebasedmedicine #machinelearning
Assessing the accuracy of machine-assisted abstract screening with DistillerAI - a user study from Gerald Gartlehner, Gernot Wagner, Linda Lux, Lisa Affengruber, Andreea Dobrescu, Angela Kaminski-Hartenthaler & Meera Viswanathan via #SysRevsJ: https://
#NLP "Assessing the accuracy of machine-assisted abstract screening with DistillerAI: a user study." https://t.co/e0KC93RtM0
not yet adequate enough to replace a human screener
Assessing the accuracy of machine-assisted abstract screening with DistillerAI: a user study https://t.co/tvKQmDxSVp
Assessing the accuracy of machine-assisted abstract screening with DistillerAI: a user study https://t.co/YmhK712Lf0 #ML #AI #ICASR #SystematicReview #Screening #DistillerAI #Automation