RT @Age_Matters: The findings .. indicate that despite increasing promotion of collaborative work in medical humanities, single authorship…
The findings .. indicate that despite increasing promotion of collaborative work in medical humanities, single authorship without acknowledgement of other disciplinary inputs is main form of scholarly contribution @AsMedHum https://t.co/ANcGt0iMdl
Authorship in the Medical Humanities: Breaking Cross-field Boundaries or Maintaining Disciplinary Divides? https://t.co/D0hpXePzhC
RT @Age_Matters: Authorship in the Medical Humanities: Breaking Cross-field Boundaries or Maintaining Disciplinary Divides? - PubMed - NCBI…
RT @Age_Matters: Authorship in the Medical Humanities: Breaking Cross-field Boundaries or Maintaining Disciplinary Divides? @AmerSocBioHum…
@MunsterMc1
Authorship in the Medical Humanities: Breaking Cross-field Boundaries or Maintaining Disciplinary Divides? - PubMed - NCBI https://t.co/nBtLwwhXas
RT @Age_Matters: Authorship in the Medical Humanities: Breaking Cross-field Boundaries or Maintaining Disciplinary Divides? @AmerSocBioHum…
Authorship in the Medical Humanities: Breaking Cross-field Boundaries or Maintaining Disciplinary Divides? @AmerSocBioHum @AsMedHum @TLRHub @IrishHumanities @RCPI_news @TrinityMed1 #loveirishresearch https://t.co/5B4wL6G82x