↓ Skip to main content

Hypophosphatasia in Japan: ALPL Mutation Analysis in 98 Unrelated Patients

Overview of attention for article published in Calcified Tissue International, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Hypophosphatasia in Japan: ALPL Mutation Analysis in 98 Unrelated Patients
Published in
Calcified Tissue International, November 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00223-019-00626-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Toshimi Michigami, Kanako Tachikawa, Miwa Yamazaki, Masanobu Kawai, Takuo Kubota, Keiichi Ozono

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unknown 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2019.
All research outputs
#4,146,218
of 13,906,652 outputs
Outputs from Calcified Tissue International
#343
of 1,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,593
of 226,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Calcified Tissue International
#6
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,906,652 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,365 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,762 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.