↓ Skip to main content

Bifidogenic and butyrogenic effects of young barely leaf extract in an in vitro human colonic microbiota model

Overview of attention for article published in AMB Express, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Bifidogenic and butyrogenic effects of young barely leaf extract in an in vitro human colonic microbiota model
Published in
AMB Express, November 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13568-019-0911-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daisuke Sasaki, Kengo Sasaki, Yasushi Kadowaki, Yasuyuki Aotsuka, Akihiko Kondo

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 50%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2019.
All research outputs
#2,214,090
of 14,051,752 outputs
Outputs from AMB Express
#52
of 883 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,228
of 291,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AMB Express
#4
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,051,752 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 883 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,188 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.