↓ Skip to main content

Frankfurt cases and the Newcomb Problem

Overview of attention for article published in Philosophical Studies, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
Title
Frankfurt cases and the Newcomb Problem
Published in
Philosophical Studies, November 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11098-019-01375-0
Authors

Arif Ahmed

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2019.
All research outputs
#7,060,383
of 14,030,753 outputs
Outputs from Philosophical Studies
#206
of 865 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,887
of 281,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophical Studies
#4
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,030,753 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 865 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,473 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.