↓ Skip to main content

A Framework for Considering Climate Change Impacts in Project Selection for Deepwater Horizon Restoration Efforts

Overview of attention for article published in Wetlands, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters
Title
A Framework for Considering Climate Change Impacts in Project Selection for Deepwater Horizon Restoration Efforts
Published in
Wetlands, November 2019
DOI 10.1007/s13157-019-01226-y
Authors

Carl Kraft, Bethany, Crandall, Raelene

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2019.
All research outputs
#4,124,309
of 14,122,411 outputs
Outputs from Wetlands
#113
of 945 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,599
of 312,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wetlands
#3
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,122,411 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 945 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,290 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.