↓ Skip to main content

Concordance between physiotherapists and physicians for care of patients with musculoskeletal disorders presenting to the emergency department

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Emergency Medicine, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters
Title
Concordance between physiotherapists and physicians for care of patients with musculoskeletal disorders presenting to the emergency department
Published in
BMC Emergency Medicine, November 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12873-019-0277-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

E. Matifat, K. Perreault, J.-S. Roy, A. Aiken, E. Gagnon, M. Mequignon, V. Lowry, S. Décary, B. Hamelin, M. Ambrosio, N. Farley, D. Pelletier, L. Carlesso, F. Desmeules

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2019.
All research outputs
#3,229,365
of 13,910,353 outputs
Outputs from BMC Emergency Medicine
#112
of 370 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,705
of 230,282 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Emergency Medicine
#20
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,910,353 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 370 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,282 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.