↓ Skip to main content

Plasma cathepsin D activity is negatively associated with hepatic insulin sensitivity in overweight and obese humans

Overview of attention for article published in Diabetologia, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Plasma cathepsin D activity is negatively associated with hepatic insulin sensitivity in overweight and obese humans
Published in
Diabetologia, November 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00125-019-05025-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lingling Ding, Gijs H. Goossens, Yvonne Oligschlaeger, Tom Houben, Ellen E. Blaak, Ronit Shiri-Sverdlov

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unknown 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2019.
All research outputs
#3,478,129
of 14,021,570 outputs
Outputs from Diabetologia
#1,599
of 3,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,542
of 279,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetologia
#45
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,021,570 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,948 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,005 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.