↓ Skip to main content

Resource partitioning among sympatric elasmobranchs in the central-western Mediterranean continental shelf

Overview of attention for article published in Marine Biology, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Resource partitioning among sympatric elasmobranchs in the central-western Mediterranean continental shelf
Published in
Marine Biology, November 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00227-019-3607-0
Authors

Antonello Mulas, Andrea Bellodi, Rita Cannas, Pierluigi Carbonara, Alessandro Cau, Martina Francesca Marongiu, Paola Pesci, Cristina Porcu, Maria Cristina Follesa

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 50%
Unspecified 1 25%
Student > Master 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 50%
Environmental Science 1 25%
Unspecified 1 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2019.
All research outputs
#10,833,472
of 14,263,181 outputs
Outputs from Marine Biology
#1,956
of 2,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#213,247
of 314,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Marine Biology
#30
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,263,181 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,355 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,962 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.