↓ Skip to main content

Hecaton: reliably detecting copy number variation in plant genomes using short read sequencing data

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
Title
Hecaton: reliably detecting copy number variation in plant genomes using short read sequencing data
Published in
BMC Genomics, November 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12864-019-6153-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raúl Y. Wijfjes, Sandra Smit, Dick de Ridder

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2019.
All research outputs
#10,564,385
of 13,888,024 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#5,751
of 8,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,521
of 221,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#413
of 679 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,888,024 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,144 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,317 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 679 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.