↓ Skip to main content

Bronchial blocker versus double-lumen endobronchial tube in minimally invasive cardiac surgery

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pulmonary Medicine, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
Title
Bronchial blocker versus double-lumen endobronchial tube in minimally invasive cardiac surgery
Published in
BMC Pulmonary Medicine, November 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12890-019-0956-x
Authors

Chuncheng Zhang, Jing Yue, Mingyue Li, Wei Jiang, Yu Pan, Zhimin Song, Cailian Shi, Weixuan Fan, Zhenxiang Pan

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2019.
All research outputs
#12,268,166
of 13,865,726 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#914
of 1,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#176,477
of 213,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#104
of 157 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,865,726 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,115 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,649 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 157 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.