↓ Skip to main content

Developing and pretesting a new patient reported outcome measure for paediatric Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/ Myalgic Encephalopathy (CFS/ME): cognitive interviews with children

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#29 of 511)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Developing and pretesting a new patient reported outcome measure for paediatric Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/ Myalgic Encephalopathy (CFS/ME): cognitive interviews with children
Published in
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, November 2019
DOI 10.1186/s41687-019-0156-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roxanne M. Parslow, Alison Shaw, Kirstie L. Haywood, Esther Crawley

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 22%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Researcher 2 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 4 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 9%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 10 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2019.
All research outputs
#2,466,063
of 23,172,045 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#29
of 511 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,108
of 364,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,172,045 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 511 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,474 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.