↓ Skip to main content

Effects of a swallowing and oral care intervention for patients following endotracheal extubation: a pre- and post-intervention study

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
56 tweeters
Title
Effects of a swallowing and oral care intervention for patients following endotracheal extubation: a pre- and post-intervention study
Published in
Critical Care, November 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13054-019-2623-2
Authors

Chung-Pei Wu, Yu-Juan Xu, Tyng-Guey Wang, Shih-Chi Ku, Ding-Cheng Chan, Jang-Jaer Lee, Yu-Chung Wei, Tzu-Yu Hsiao, Cheryl Chia-Hui Chen

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 56 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2019.
All research outputs
#489,083
of 13,935,840 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#421
of 4,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,345
of 242,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#68
of 326 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,935,840 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,378 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,937 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 326 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.