↓ Skip to main content

Clinical significance of rectus femoris diameter in heart failure patients

Overview of attention for article published in Heart & Vessels, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Clinical significance of rectus femoris diameter in heart failure patients
Published in
Heart & Vessels, November 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00380-019-01534-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yoshimi Sato, Hirokazu Shiraishi, Naohiko Nakanishi, Kan Zen, Takeshi Nakamura, Tetsuhiro Yamano, Takeshi Shirayama, Satoaki Matoba

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 1 50%
Researcher 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 1 50%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2019.
All research outputs
#10,990,450
of 13,851,111 outputs
Outputs from Heart & Vessels
#213
of 420 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,713
of 213,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Heart & Vessels
#4
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,851,111 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 420 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,108 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.