↓ Skip to main content

Quercetin prevents necroptosis of oligodendrocytes by inhibiting macrophages/microglia polarization to M1 phenotype after spinal cord injury in rats

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuroinflammation, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
Title
Quercetin prevents necroptosis of oligodendrocytes by inhibiting macrophages/microglia polarization to M1 phenotype after spinal cord injury in rats
Published in
Journal of Neuroinflammation, November 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12974-019-1613-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hong Fan, Hai-Bin Tang, Le-Qun Shan, Shi-Chang Liu, Da-Geng Huang, Xun Chen, Zhe Chen, Ming Yang, Xin-Hua Yin, Hao Yang, Ding-Jun Hao

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2019.
All research outputs
#10,545,427
of 13,865,726 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroinflammation
#1,090
of 1,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,452
of 216,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroinflammation
#92
of 169 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,865,726 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,640 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 216,592 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 169 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.