↓ Skip to main content

Socio-economic development, scientific research, and exploitation explain differences in conservation status of marine and freshwater chondrichthyans among countries

Overview of attention for article published in Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
19 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
Socio-economic development, scientific research, and exploitation explain differences in conservation status of marine and freshwater chondrichthyans among countries
Published in
Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, November 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11160-019-09584-w
Authors

Luis O. Lucifora, Santiago A. Barbini, Pablo A. Scarabotti, David E. Sabadin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Unspecified 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 17 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 25%
Environmental Science 3 8%
Unspecified 2 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 6%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 18 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2020.
All research outputs
#3,260,547
of 25,083,571 outputs
Outputs from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#175
of 628 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,643
of 371,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,083,571 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 628 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,925 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.