↓ Skip to main content

From Credit Risk to Social Impact: On the Funding Determinants in Interest-Free Peer-to-Peer Lending

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Business Ethics, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
From Credit Risk to Social Impact: On the Funding Determinants in Interest-Free Peer-to-Peer Lending
Published in
Journal of Business Ethics, November 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10551-019-04311-8
Authors

Gregor Dorfleitner, Eva-Maria Oswald, Rongxin Zhang

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2019.
All research outputs
#11,116,730
of 14,006,078 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business Ethics
#1,751
of 2,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,837
of 273,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business Ethics
#60
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,006,078 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,110 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,395 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.