↓ Skip to main content

Deep learning for pollen allergy surveillance from twitter in Australia

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 tweeters
Title
Deep learning for pollen allergy surveillance from twitter in Australia
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, November 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12911-019-0921-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jia Rong, Sandra Michalska, Sudha Subramani, Jiahua Du, Hua Wang

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2019.
All research outputs
#1,505,460
of 13,897,220 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#136
of 1,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,139
of 227,885 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#16
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,897,220 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,259 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,885 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.