↓ Skip to main content

Extent of surrounding edema does not correlate with acute complications after radiosurgery for melanoma brain metastases

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuro-Oncology, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Extent of surrounding edema does not correlate with acute complications after radiosurgery for melanoma brain metastases
Published in
Journal of Neuro-Oncology, November 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11060-019-03330-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amelia Jardim, Justin Scott, Zachery Drew, Matthew C. Foote, Ananthababu P. Sadasivan, Bruce Hall, Sarah L. Olson, Mihir Shanker, Mark B. Pinkham

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2019.
All research outputs
#3,552,765
of 13,918,554 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#313
of 2,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,975
of 238,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#11
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,918,554 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,090 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,415 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.