↓ Skip to main content

Implementation of the Smoking Treatment and Recovery (STAR) program: healthy cancer survivorship through integrated tobacco control

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cancer Survivorship, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
Title
Implementation of the Smoking Treatment and Recovery (STAR) program: healthy cancer survivorship through integrated tobacco control
Published in
Journal of Cancer Survivorship, November 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11764-019-00826-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kathryn L. Taylor, Shelby Fallon, Deepa Subramaniam, Kimberly Davis, Chan To, Tania Lobo, Kenneth P. Tercyak, Julia Friberg, Mara Tynan, Emily Russell, Waseem Ahmed, Mary Chris Ponder, Lisa Cusaac, Jillian Thompson, Kellie Gardner, Chul Kim, Louis M. Weiner

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2019.
All research outputs
#7,562,305
of 14,015,503 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cancer Survivorship
#309
of 537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,165
of 280,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cancer Survivorship
#14
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,015,503 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.