↓ Skip to main content

The Infant Simulator Paradigm with Non-Parents: Attitudes, Physiology, and Observed Caregiving

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Child & Family Studies, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
The Infant Simulator Paradigm with Non-Parents: Attitudes, Physiology, and Observed Caregiving
Published in
Journal of Child & Family Studies, November 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10826-019-01643-x
Authors

Megan M. Pruitt, Erin R. McKay, Gabriela Lelakowska, Naomi V. Ekas

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2019.
All research outputs
#8,779,584
of 13,999,449 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Child & Family Studies
#594
of 934 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,912
of 272,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Child & Family Studies
#10
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,999,449 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 934 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,866 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.