↓ Skip to main content

Novel nose poke-based temporal discrimination tasks with concurrent in vivo calcium imaging in freely moving mice

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Brain, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Novel nose poke-based temporal discrimination tasks with concurrent in vivo calcium imaging in freely moving mice
Published in
Molecular Brain, November 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13041-019-0515-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

William D. Marks, Hisayuki Osanai, Jun Yamamoto, Sachie K. Ogawa, Takashi Kitamura

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 67%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 3 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2019.
All research outputs
#7,328,055
of 13,999,449 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Brain
#222
of 649 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,712
of 272,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Brain
#26
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,999,449 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 649 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,865 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.