↓ Skip to main content

Desiccation resistance and pigmentation variation reflects bioclimatic differences in the Drosophila americana species complex

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Evolutionary Biology, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 tweeters
Title
Desiccation resistance and pigmentation variation reflects bioclimatic differences in the Drosophila americana species complex
Published in
BMC Evolutionary Biology, November 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12862-019-1536-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeremy S. Davis, Leonie C. Moyle

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2019.
All research outputs
#2,243,075
of 13,897,220 outputs
Outputs from BMC Evolutionary Biology
#771
of 2,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,523
of 231,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Evolutionary Biology
#63
of 181 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,897,220 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,174 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 181 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.