↓ Skip to main content

Clarification of the dispensability of PDX1.2 for Arabidopsis viability using CRISPR/Cas9

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Plant Biology, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
Title
Clarification of the dispensability of PDX1.2 for Arabidopsis viability using CRISPR/Cas9
Published in
BMC Plant Biology, November 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12870-019-2071-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elisa Dell’Aglio, Ivan Dalvit, Sylvain Loubéry, Teresa B. Fitzpatrick

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2019.
All research outputs
#7,177,011
of 13,918,554 outputs
Outputs from BMC Plant Biology
#551
of 1,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,959
of 240,082 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Plant Biology
#72
of 332 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,918,554 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,937 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,082 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 332 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.