↓ Skip to main content

Increasing Blood Pressure by Greater Splanchnic Nerve Stimulation: a Feasibility Study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Increasing Blood Pressure by Greater Splanchnic Nerve Stimulation: a Feasibility Study
Published in
Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research, November 2019
DOI 10.1007/s12265-019-09929-7
Authors

Anisha Bapna, Christopher Adin, Zoar J. Engelman, Marat Fudim

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unknown 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2019.
All research outputs
#3,441,653
of 13,989,129 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research
#56
of 290 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,590
of 271,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,989,129 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 290 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,670 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.