↓ Skip to main content

European Medicines Agency Policy 0070: an exploratory review of data utility in clinical study reports for academic research

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
18 tweeters
Title
European Medicines Agency Policy 0070: an exploratory review of data utility in clinical study reports for academic research
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, November 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12874-019-0836-3
Authors

Jean-Marc Ferran, Sarah J. Nevitt

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2019.
All research outputs
#1,397,944
of 13,927,844 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#228
of 1,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,747
of 244,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#42
of 170 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,927,844 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,275 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,072 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 170 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.