↓ Skip to main content

Differences Between Founder-Led and Non-Founder-Led Congregations: A Research Note

Overview of attention for article published in Review of Religious Research, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
Title
Differences Between Founder-Led and Non-Founder-Led Congregations: A Research Note
Published in
Review of Religious Research, November 2019
DOI 10.1007/s13644-019-00390-1
Authors

Richard N. Pitt, Patrick Washington

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2019.
All research outputs
#4,186,018
of 14,006,355 outputs
Outputs from Review of Religious Research
#51
of 208 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,747
of 276,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Review of Religious Research
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,006,355 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 208 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,714 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them