↓ Skip to main content

Dynamics in higher education choice: weighing one’s multiple interests in light of available programmes

Overview of attention for article published in Higher Education, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Dynamics in higher education choice: weighing one’s multiple interests in light of available programmes
Published in
Higher Education, November 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10734-019-00452-x
Authors

Jonne Pieter Vulperhorst, Roeland Matthijs van der Rijst, Sanne Floor Akkerman

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 50%
Student > Master 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 1 50%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2019.
All research outputs
#10,648,595
of 13,999,514 outputs
Outputs from Higher Education
#927
of 1,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,099
of 274,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Higher Education
#9
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,999,514 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,030 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,952 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.