↓ Skip to main content

Bedside breath tests in children with abdominal pain: a prospective pilot feasibility study

Overview of attention for article published in Pilot and Feasibility Studies, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Bedside breath tests in children with abdominal pain: a prospective pilot feasibility study
Published in
Pilot and Feasibility Studies, November 2019
DOI 10.1186/s40814-019-0502-x
Authors

David C. Wong, Samuel D. Relton, Victoria Lane, Mohamed Ismail, Victoria Goss, Jane Bytheway, Robert M. West, Jim Deuchars, Jonathan Sutcliffe

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 50%
Lecturer 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 50%
Unspecified 1 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2019.
All research outputs
#7,035,108
of 13,989,129 outputs
Outputs from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#225
of 427 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,061
of 272,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#58
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,989,129 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 427 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,077 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.