↓ Skip to main content


Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Economic Growth, January 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#49 of 177)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

2 news outlets


118 Dimensions

Readers on

17 Mendeley
Published in
Journal of Economic Growth, January 2002
DOI 10.1023/a:1013418610712

Athanasios Vamvakidis

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 6%
Kenya 1 6%
Italy 1 6%
Romania 1 6%
Unknown 13 76%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 59%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 53%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 41%
Student > Bachelor 6 35%
Lecturer 3 18%
Other 8 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 30 176%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 41%
Social Sciences 5 29%
Engineering 1 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2019.
All research outputs
of 13,845,935 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Economic Growth
of 177 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 214,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Economic Growth
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,845,935 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 177 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,331 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.