↓ Skip to main content

The northern fluted point complex: technological and morphological evidence of adaptation and risk in the late Pleistocene-early Holocene Arctic

Overview of attention for article published in Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
Title
The northern fluted point complex: technological and morphological evidence of adaptation and risk in the late Pleistocene-early Holocene Arctic
Published in
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, April 2016
DOI 10.1007/s12520-016-0335-y
Authors

Heather L. Smith, Thomas J. DeWitt

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2016.
All research outputs
#5,756,822
of 7,607,694 outputs
Outputs from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
#101
of 121 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#187,177
of 267,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
#7
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 7,607,694 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 121 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,111 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.