↓ Skip to main content

Protocol for a systematic review of the use of qualitative comparative analysis for evaluative questions in public health research

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
Title
Protocol for a systematic review of the use of qualitative comparative analysis for evaluative questions in public health research
Published in
Systematic Reviews, November 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13643-019-1159-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Benjamin Hanckel, Mark Petticrew, James Thomas, Judith Green

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2019.
All research outputs
#10,986,259
of 13,845,935 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#1,056
of 1,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,514
of 217,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#188
of 201 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,845,935 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,193 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 217,169 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 201 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.