↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating the Influence of Intraverbal Topography in Conditional Discrimination Procedures

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Evaluating the Influence of Intraverbal Topography in Conditional Discrimination Procedures
Published in
Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders, November 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10803-019-04275-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lyndsay A. Fairchild, Daniel L. Gadke, Kasee K. Stratton, Emily S. Mathis, Alexander B. Clarke

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2019.
All research outputs
#12,370,142
of 13,982,034 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders
#3,161
of 3,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223,880
of 271,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders
#83
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,982,034 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,417 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,757 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.