↓ Skip to main content

Fabrication of polydimethylsiloxane nanofluidic chips under AFM tip-based nanomilling process

Overview of attention for article published in Discover Nano, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
Fabrication of polydimethylsiloxane nanofluidic chips under AFM tip-based nanomilling process
Published in
Discover Nano, April 2019
DOI 10.1186/s11671-019-2962-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jiqiang Wang, Yongda Yan, Yanquan Geng, Yang Gan, Zhuo Fang

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 15%
Student > Master 4 15%
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 11 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 6 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Chemistry 2 7%
Materials Science 1 4%
Physics and Astronomy 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 15 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2019.
All research outputs
#17,295,853
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Discover Nano
#542
of 1,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#232,500
of 363,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Discover Nano
#10
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,149 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,645 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.